The British Ambassador to Lebanon praised him even more profusely, but he remains at his job.

To sweeten the pill, the program calls for a “secure and universally recognized Israel,” though Iran, Syria, and Hezbollah-dominated Lebanon cannot be expected to recognize the Jewish state anytime soon.

It is a pleasure to see the UK, which so recently fought in Belize and the Falklands over its imperial ambitions, so concerned about the human rights of Arabs.

Turkish PM Erekat, a personal friend of Olmert, complained that Israel flaunts Obama’s peace efforts. Yeah, bad Jews don’t want to be trapped in the “Auschwitz borders.”

IDF Chief of Staff Ashkenazi described the Gaza clashes that left two Jewish soldiers dead as “the high price of Israeli freedom.” Nonsense. The soldiers died not for freedom, but because the Israeli government lacks any strategic vision about Gaza and IDF made the tactical error of sending infantry instead of helicopters into the fighting.

The expulsion is judicially unwarranted: there was no trial and the Brits were unable to assemble any evidence confirming Israeli involvement. The expulsion therefore effectively names Mossad’s chief as a criminal responsible for passport forgery and subject to arrest.

Let’s see if Israel would have the guts to expel a British Embassy official in retaliation, which is standard diplomatic procedure for self-respecting states.

Since neither the liquidation of Mabhouh nor the forgery of  passports is considered illegal in Israel, Britain has no right to conduct criminal investigation here even with the approval of subservient Israeli authorities.

We would like to see the British reaction if Israeli police were to arrive in London to interview the many British citizens who happen to be active Hezbollah members.

The Falklands debacle has not imparted to the British government the good sense to stop calling Judea and Samaria ‘occupied’ territories.

In practical terms, British actions may be commendable and might even set Muslim terrorists against the UK. On the other hand, the ban is a clear violation of free speech rights, and it establishes a dangerous precedent.

Why doesn’t Israel start prosecuting visiting British officials on equally spurious charges of association with terrorist organizations and racial incitement against Jews?

One is left to wonder why religious discrimination is permissible while ethnic discrimination is not. The court had little latitude in deciding the case since, technically, Judaism is indeed an ethnicity because a descendant of Jews is a Jew. As with universal jurisdiction, British laws are biased against Jews.

Since Britain has decided on the Jewish state’s borders, it is only natural that it should also decide who is a Jew.

British courts have issued arrest warrants against Israeli officials numerous times, but the UK government’s reaction has always been muted. This time, however, the warrant was not issued against a general or a right-winger, but Tony Blair’s leftist peace partner.

The British won’t change their law to close the loophole. At most, a state prosecutor would attend court hearings.

Britain was the only major European country to support the Swedish draft that proclaimed Jerusalem the Palestinian capital.

Even if the British government believes that the Jewish state occupies Judea illegally, it urges no similar differentiation for products coming from the world’s many other occupied territories.

Goods from the territories controlled by Fatah and Hamas terrorist groups are not targeted by the boycott.

While Muslims make up only 5% of British population, they grow 10 times faster than Christians.

The English Defense League, a right-wing organization we praised recently, had called on their members to counter-demonstrate. The expected clash pushed police to limit the Muslim demonstration to insignificance.

The League, whose name is unmistakably similar to Rabbi Kahane’s Jewish Defense League, protests the onslaught of alien immigrants. The League is politically-correctly disguised as a group opposed to violent Islam.

Instead of encouraging anti-Islamic feelings by any possible means, Jews side with our Muslim enemies to protest the right-wingers.

While their behavior is offensive, it does not present a clear danger to society, and the proper way of dealing with it is through civil defamation suits.

The group, which is linked to the rising British National Party, planned attacks on Muslim rather than Jewish targets. The crackdown appears to be the establishment’s reaction to BNP’s electoral gains.

Far-right groups worldwide are increasingly turning from anti-Semitic to anti-Muslim attacks. Short of welcoming the patriots outright, Jewish liberals better turn a blind eye to them.

The case was brought by a woman who “converted” to Judaism under the Reform canon, which involves little more than an Allah Akbar declaration. Her child, naturally, was denied admission into an Orthodox school.

The court ruled that the admission criterion was ethnic rather than religious. Then Christian schools are also ethnic, because the pupils are children of Christian parents and made no conscious choice of religion themselves. It is also unclear why religious discrimination is legal while ethnic discrimination is not.

If the House of Lords upholds the appeal court’s decision, the twenty-three-centuriy-old system of Jewish education may fall apart under the onslaught of those who seek free education for their children in private Jewish schools. More likely, Jews will exclude the gentiles implicitly with measures such as private scholarships to Jews only.

Lest you think that the British court is just anti-Semitic, the Israeli High Court ruled years ago that the Jewish National Fund cannot refuse to lease Arabs land bought and developed with private Jewish money.

Bercow has been implicated in tax fraud over real estate sales.

As usual, court Jews are the species most dangerous to Israel.