On visiting Israel, British Attorney-General Patricia Scotland praised universal jurisdiction as her country’s way of prosecuting war criminals—namely, Israelis. Other British officials are less candid: they either promise to curtail universal jurisdiction or accuse their parliament of blocking the changes.
Why doesn’t Israel start prosecuting visiting British officials on equally spurious charges of association with terrorist organizations and racial incitement against Jews?
I wonder why this universal jurisdiction Israel, Britain points out, has been such an offense. As I see it, there’s nothing wrong with it.But as usual Jews pretend this somehow restricts their rights. As I see it, the universal jurisdiction Israel Britain remarks, is so much against because it actually has some grounds for its adoption.
Lately, Britain has behaved in a strange way! Apart from this universal jurisdiction, they also didn’t hesitate to violate human rights and now Islam for Britain banned.