
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We&#8217;re the Hebrews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://samsonblinded.org/blog/were-the-hebrews.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://samsonblinded.org/blog/were-the-hebrews.htm</link>
	<description>A Machiavellian Perspective on the Middle East Conflict</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 18:30:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ray Bright</title>
		<link>http://samsonblinded.org/blog/were-the-hebrews.htm/comment-page-1#comment-67832</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Bright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samsonblinded.org/blog/were-the-hebrews.htm#comment-67832</guid>
		<description>Obadiah,

Indeed human ethics and morality has changed but little in the last 3000, therefore Machiavellian thinking is is still rational, no need for Torah or any other &quot;divine&quot; justification.

So yes, let&#039;s be Machiavellian as long as it is rational, AND at the same time let&#039;s contribute to transformation of our ethics and morality. This requires scientific (logical and experiential/experimental) approach to sociology, psychology, and indeed to religion. 
We must transform religion to a (experiential)science just like we have transformed physics, chemistry and biology.
Moses&#039; relationship with  God was experiential, it was not based on a dogma.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obadiah,</p>
<p>Indeed human ethics and morality has changed but little in the last 3000, therefore Machiavellian thinking is is still rational, no need for Torah or any other &#8220;divine&#8221; justification.</p>
<p>So yes, let&#8217;s be Machiavellian as long as it is rational, AND at the same time let&#8217;s contribute to transformation of our ethics and morality. This requires scientific (logical and experiential/experimental) approach to sociology, psychology, and indeed to religion.<br />
We must transform religion to a (experiential)science just like we have transformed physics, chemistry and biology.<br />
Moses&#8217; relationship with  God was experiential, it was not based on a dogma.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

