There is unmistakable similarity between the Stalinist society laid bare by Koestler in his Darkness at Noon and the post-Zionist Israel. The defining characteristic of Stalinist society was a suppression of common morality now for the sake of attaining high ideals later. The ideals have to be sufficiently abstract so that the people won’t be able to evaluate whether the ends justify the means; besides being shiny, the ends are not clear. So in Israel. Zionists plunged to the depths of immorality such as hunting the fellow Jews (Kach, etc) without ever clarifying what they want to achieve. Just like their Russian counterparts spoke of the ultimate “worker’s state” while robbing and denigrating those same workers, Zionists declared a goal of the Jewish state without ever clarifying what “Jewish” means to them. Russian bureaucracy usurped the power in the name of workers; Zionist bureaucracy usurped the power while pushing religious and nationalist Jews onto the society’s persecuted fringes. Communists and Zionists were unable to formulate their goals because they had no clear goals. A short logical argument immediately demonstrates that planned socialist economy benefits the state rather than workers, and socialist Zionism opposes Judaism and Jewishness.
Koestler convincingly shows how the good communists were persuaded to submit to evil communists because the evil communists had currently the best chance of furthering the goals of communism. And so in Israel. Common Israelis believe the top political echelon, though corrupt and treacherous, works to uphold Zionist goals, and they submit to its rule. In the case of, for example, Baruch Goldstein it is evident that he could not have shot 150 Arabs with four cartridges. The guards, however, were persuaded to retract their testimonies so that the government could blame Goldstein for the “massacre” and disband the Kach party he belonged to. In another episode, many people in the sterile zone saw Rabin standing up and walking to his car after being “fatally shot” by Amir; dozens of medical personnel in the hospital knew that Rabin was fatally shot in the surgery room. All of them kept silent. It is impossible that all of them are cowards, submitting to Shin-Bet’s threats. Just like during the Soviet witch hunt trials, all of them were persuaded that temporary injustice justifies the shining ends of Zionism. Probably, just like the Koestler’s hero, they were offered an escape for their conscience: a possibility that at some remote date the truth will be allowed to stand and the non-guilty – acquitted. Israeli establishment can now afford to acquit Amir or Goldstein: Kach is dead, and the image of right-wingers stained irreparably. Indeed, they are all but formally acquitted: a majority of Israelis, polls show, don’t buy the official version of Rabin’s assassination. They, however, still don’t vote for the smeared right-wingers. Decades later, Kahane and Goldstein will be national heroes, just like today David Raziel and Avraham Stern, hunted by Zionists during their lifetime, became the official heroes; dead heroes don’t threaten the establishment.
Russian communists like the Koestler’s hero worked for the system. To rebel against the system was to admit one’s entire life efforts wrong. That was too much to bear. And so in Israel. Israelis suffer for the system from their early age. They risk their lives in buses, on the streets, and in the army. They see they dear ones killed or maimed. They suffer heavy taxation and international hostility. For common Israelis, to doubt the system is to admit their lifetime sacrifices futile.
Just like the communism, Zionism evolves. One notion having been discredited, the ruling clique embraces another. From Jewish state to a state with many Arabs to the state with looming Arab majority. From socialist state to atheist state to the state were the Supreme Court and the government direct rabbinical affairs. From zealously Jewish state to the state with affirmative action for Arabs and police pogroms in Jewish religious neighborhoods. It’s never possible to prove that the rulers betrayed their own goals because the goals are continuously adapted to the ongoing treachery.
Russia has never abandoned its Stalinist stature. Common Russians were silent in the face of their government blowing the houses in Moscow to instigate the war with Chechnya. They accepted transparent lies by the government just like their grandfathers accepted the ridiculous witch hunt trials. So does Israel. Jews were silent when Ben Gurion’s agents killed Arlozoroff or bullet-sprayed Altalena. Israelis, even conservatives, didn’t protest the government murdering Kahane or Zeevi.
Both communists and Zionists scored early successes by mobilizing near-free labor for ideologically inspired economic projects. Russian industrialization and Israeli agriculture leapfrogged due to the selfless labor efforts. But ideology quickly exhausts its economic potential as the societies grow, become diversified, and economic activities evolve too complex for straightforward planning. Initially more efficient than the conservative market-oriented economies, ideologically driven economies quickly fall behind, burdened by systemic distortions and lack of economic stimuli. Artificial ideologies are dangerous to minds, but also to pockets.
Israel has to abandon shining Zionism for the old-fashioned Judaism. The only alternative is communal death.


Obadiah says:
"Israel has to abandon shining Zionism for the old-fashioned Judaism"
Then Israel will no longer be a home to a good patriotic non-religious Jews.
In many ways Israel is closely tracking history of the Soviet Union, with a delay of circa 30 years. I wonder what will happen to it in 2017-2021.
Ray, why is that? Judaism condones any Jews so far as they don't lapse into idolatry.
"Israelis, even conservatives, didn’t protest the government murdering Kahane or Zeevi."
Please explain this since it was reported in the news otherwise.
The evidence is circumstantial. For Zeevi's murder, I can refer you to Barry Chamish. One need not agree with his conjectures to consider the facts. Barry points out to many incongruent facts in the official versions.
About r.Kahane. Start with the murder of Benny Kahane, his son. He was shot in the car with his wife and kids. Benny and Talia were riddled with bullets, but not a single bullet hit the rear seat where the children were sitting. That's not how Arabs are shooting. And no random terrorists pump close to 70 bullets in a car. That's Shabak's signature. True, Israeli government detained an alleged Arab assassin, but that Arab was guilty of many other murders, and there was no problem asking him to accept responsibility for two more murders.
Back to r.Meir Kahane. Arabs never shot right-wing Jewish leaders except three Kahanists: the rav, his son, and Zeevi. Arabs had no reason to kill r.Kahane who became a scarecrow for most Jews. But the establishment had to kill him after he started the campaign for referendum in Israel which would have most certainly stop the peace process. So r.Kahane was first removed from the Knesset with anti-racist law, and when that didn't stop him, he was killed.
His assassin, Nosair was acquitted on technicality. His cell later participated in the exceedingly odd first WTC bombing. The fellows were framed, as when they claimed deposit for the blown car.
Nosair perfectly handled firearms - not your regular Arab. Surprisingly, a guard from the nearest post office was near to kill Nosair, and the guard happened to wear body armor - not your regular post office guard in 1990.
And on, and on. R.Kahane himself have told that Shabak threatened him. Anyway, there's plenty written on the subject, this is just a short overview.
You bring some disturbing arguments here, Danny.
Was R.Kahane's son such a threat? I never heard anything about him in the news, until his… assassination?
Danny,
You said:
"Ray, why is that? Judaism condones any Jews so far as they don’t lapse into idolatry."
=
I don't know what "idolatry" means. If it is worshiping man made images, and objects than a lot things could be idolatry: Muslims kissing their Black stone, Jews worshiping Torah, or some other religious symbol (I don't know what they worship perhaps the candle holder?), Christians kissing the cross, or "holy" icons, etc. And frankly even though I personally think that it is stupid, I don't see a great harm to other people in them doing so. What IS harmful, is when the so called "religious" people start imposing their beliefs and moral standards on others. I don't want to have someone telling me that I should or should not do this or that in my private life, as long as it does not encroach on anybody else's freedom. What is it to them if I work on Sabbath? Or practice homo-sexuality, or wife-swapping (as long as I don't do that in front of them).
==
There is something much deeper about being Jewish, and this true value is being lost because people don't really know what it is.
I believe that a person should be able to become Jewish by claiming as his, the history of Jews and by making a sincere promise to be a part of Jewish nation. When people are sworn in as new US citizens they have to make an oath among other things to defend their new country from all enemies internal and external and to be willing to bear arms or perform other services of national importance. New Americans adopt American history as their own. They may be of Mexican or Vietnamese origins, but when they become American, they claim the founders of America as THEIR “Founding Fathers” and they promise to hold American constitution as their supreme law. Most people are sincere and many have tears in their eyes. Typically the new immigrants are just as patriotic as those who’s ancestors came here 300 yeas ago. By these standards, most Israeli Arabs clearly don't qualify to be Israeli citizens.
They are unlike German and Japanese Americans who willingly fought for America against the countries of their ancestors. This loyalty is what matters, and not whether they practice Zen or Paganism!
I would not allow Muslims to be Israeli, because Israel is a country of Jews, and Islam explicitly condemns Jews and many Hadiths call for eradication of Jews.
Any Arab residing in Israel should only be allowed to be a citizen if he/she publicly renounce all the parts of Koran that are anti-Jewish, or put loyalty to Islam above loyalty to their non-Islamic country. They should also be required to study the history of Jews and take exam. (Just like new Americans are required to take an exam on American history and government). Of course Jewish history goes back 4000 years, while American only 400, so the Israeli citizenship should be harder:)
This should be a requirement in every non-Muslim country, but it is a suicidal insanity for Israel to not require that.
Likewise, Christians would have to renounce all the anti-Semitic parts of Christianity, if they wished to become Israeli citizens. (Such as the idiotic notion that “Jews killed Jesus” and that “Jesus blood is on their heads”, and other anti-Semitic passages in the “New-Testament”.
Arabs are our close relatives often genetically indistinguishable from Jews. Israel must be clearly declared as Jewish country, and those (few) among Arabs who sincerely chose to be Israelis in and prove their sincerity through military service should be treated as Jews. Perhaps even honored more, because renouncing their fascist Koran and serving Israel is requires great courage.
Erick: Binyamin Kahane was a decent man, a good rabbi, and the founder of Kahane Chai.
Ray: Let's look at it from the other side. A person who "promises to be a part of Jewish nation," what reason does he have to board the train to Auschwitz or to condemn his children/ grandchildren to such fate?
Ray — New citizens of the United States are SUPPOSED to renounce all other allegiances. In reality, the US now recognizes dual citizenship — for the foreign born! My daughter was born in Germany (on an American Army base) — when she reached 18 years old, she could theoretically have chosen German citizenship, but not US AND German — she would have to choose. A Mexican illegal, however, now has MORE rights than you (or my daughter) do — he can vote in American elections AND Mexican elections and there is no penalty. Same for Iraqis that were US citizens but were allowed to vote in the recent Iraqi elections. The Revolution is coming very soon. It will be unpleasant.
===
By the way, the next time a redneck says something to you about the Jews killing Jesus, first of all, point out that the Romans killed him (but supposedly he rose from the dead anyway), and secondly, that Jesus was a Jew. That ought to shut them up.
===
And, just one more time, if being Jewish is not racial and is not religious, just what is it?
===
And Ray, you have asked why the non-government Jews do not take self-defense into their own hands? I think the Kahane assasinations answers that. Not that many Jesuses or Kahanes out there.
So if I were a Mexican… I'd be doing better off than you, Jo?
Well, on the good side - at least I'm not a Mexican
Ce pasa?
In Canada, we have no hero culture, no cult of being a rightist or a leftist but we certainly have a strong legal culture… proportional to recognition of cultural survival of all Canada's cultural communities. We have Native lands where the first language is the Language of the tribe and is administered by the tribe and one has to be a member of the tribe to establish oneself.
The first object is the survival of a community. Cultural genocide is also a form of genocide. Now Jews have to define what are the parameters of Jewish Law and cultural identity.
In other words, if Jews are only one religion and no nation according to some opponents they all had one common king before the post-Solomon Era. The home of these Kings was Jerusalem… The hope of every Jew is to return to Jerusalem where their King Solomon was given the highest wisdom by God and did make peace with all his neighbours.
It was King Solomon who made Jerusalem the city of peace by wisdom… everybody else Post-Solomon used the sword.
Jesus' preoccupation was about creating a legal culture that would be a constitutional parameter allowing to observe the distance in between the law and its true application for Jesus could observe with his own eyes the Post-Solomon Era both in the Jewish and non-Jewish communities and schools of thought.
One of the main problems in dealing with Jewish identity worldwide is understanding Jesus the constitutionalist and the demonstration that Christians have failed to understand Jesus as a Jewish constitutionalist is that very few can explain: 'Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword'?(Matthew 10:34) Jesus was not only born a Jew but also a constitutionalist in the Jewish tradition in the Post-Solomon Era. Jews are about upholding the law of God and the law of God must be sustained by a just legal culture towards everyone. A just legal culture does not mean non-recognition of cultural appearance on earth for everyone is part of this earth's cultural ecology of world science and knowledge.
The USA could fight with the Navajo codes of their Natives in WWII this is why no enemy could defeat their coding system…justice is also defense.
Karole du Pont — I had a very good German friend, long ago in college here in the US, who was pursuing his philosophy degree. He told me that he found it much easier to study Emmanuael Kant, his primary focus, in English translation rather than the original German, because of the circuitous and indefinite rambling style of the academic, philosophical German. I have a similar problem with your posts. What are you saying?
===
One thing I do understand (I think) is your statement that "Jesus' preoccupation was about creating a legal culture …" That is simply incorrect — Jesus was a mystic, not a "constitutionalist". He was concerned with the life of the spirit, not the political organization of the state.
Erick — If you were one of the Visigoth Conquistadors that rule Mexico, you would be doing pretty darn well. But if you were one of the little Indian illiterates sent to the US to pick lettuce, even with free health care and double voting privileges, it would be a very hard life.
As Confucius would have said, Hard compared to what?
Well, then, it's a good thing I'm not Mexican, or Indian.
The foreign workers that are brought to Israel as slaves are doing a lot worse, I'm sure.
The irony is that they're probably even worse in their home country.
So, god has created man in his image, and man has created an abomination in the world of god.
Disappointed, god decided to leave man to his own deviations.
Danny — Hard compared to the easy life of the lazy, illiterate, drugged-out pig-people living off welfare, which is what many of the lettuce pickers' children will end up as. There is no doubt that the poor in the US live better than the middle class in the rest of the world or even the rich in much of the world. Just one reason that it is so hard to motivate the American people.
Pig-people, Joseph?
Erick — Those with "calorie-burning issues"
.
LOL
Deliciously honest.