The Bible promises the nation of Israel a huge country from Nile to Euphrates. Such country was unsustainable and utterly unnecessary for Jews in antiquity. “From Nile” includes Sinai, but even Egypt didn’t govern the Sinai in the times of old except for a narrow strip. The Promised Land was a technical impossibility and a burden to maintain. The land wasn’t prized, but consisted of deserts and steppes. If seducing Hebrews with a promise, a takeover of Egypt would be much more attractive.
Only in the late twentieth century did we understand the rationale behind the Promised Land. Israel critically needs the Sinai for depth of defense against Islamist Egypt. If not for Sinai and the Negev, the initial thrust of the Yom Kippur war would have drowned the Jews in the sea. Now that Egypt acquires missiles and cutting-edge aircraft, the depth of defense the Sinai accords to the Jewish state becomes all the more important.
The Promised Land includes a Frankenstein state of Lebanon. Jews so far failed to realize the commandment and conquer that land, driving the ever-fighting Lebanese tribes away to Syria – and the Lebanese tribes prove a perpetual source of trouble for Jewish Galilee.
Likewise with Euphrates. Jordanian monarchy won’t last long. Palestinian majority will take over that desert state and, unable to create a viable economy there, will turn to nationalism and militancy. Jordan will become a huge Gaza, rife with terrorist training camps. Jordanians will extend their influence to those Arabs whom Israel failed to expel in violation of the commandment, and they became “a trap for you,” “sore in your eye,” and “masters over you.” In order to establish security, Israel would have no choice but to extend toward Euphrates, relocating the hostile Arabs to Iraq. As if prompting Israel to fulfill the commandment, a strong and militant state of Iraq was invaded for no reason and destroyed; now the way for relocating Palestinians and Jordanians is cleared.
Israel also needs a huge territory to disperse her population. The hi-rise buildings in Israeli cities will become a death trap in a major earthquake – and Israel is located on the two lines of tectonic activity. Jews must live in light, single-story houses. Dispersing the population is also the best way to avoid or mitigate Islamic nuclear strike. Pakistan, besieged by the Islamists, has an unknown number of nuclear bombs, probably more than fifty. Saudi Arabia likely hoards some of the Pakistani nukes in return for financing its nuclear program. Iran, Egypt, Libya, Algeria, and Morocco have the critical know-how in nuclear technologies, and North Korea stands ready to help them. There is absolute certainty that Islamic terrorists will lay their hands on nuclear weapons fairly soon. Crude nukes are not that apocalyptic: a primitive bomb detonated at the ground level in Tel Aviv would kill something like 10,000 Jews – a sorrowful but statistically insignificant number. Looking at Nagasaki, the long-term effects of nuclear bombing are also tolerable. So instead of panicking, Jews should disperse into a single-storey society interconnected by the latest communication networks rather than Tel Aviv’s promenades. And that why we need the Promised Land in its entirety.
It’s great to live in peace. Persecuted for millennia, exterminated recently, and embattled for decades, Jews long for peace as no other nation does. We were ready to kiss Sadat when he came to Israel, signaling the peace. We accept hard choices and concessions for peace. Unfortunately, among the sea of Muslims, Israel will never live in peace. It is a heart-rending assertion, but true nonetheless.
And so the Torah instructs us to fight for safety.


I think that Israel could make a 50 years strategic alliance with Syria: Syrians long to be a local power and with Israel's help they could become a dominant Arab country: Syria could get Jordan where all Palestinian Arabs could be relocated. Then Syria would receive huge international help for the poor Palestinians. And with international recognition could build a strong and healthy economy. If Syrians achieve a decent living standard, they will be in no harry to go to war against Israel. They strength would depend on co-operation with Israel. Eventually they could control much of the Middle East. From Mecca to Lebanon, and the Sunni parts of Iraq.
And so the Torah instructs us to fight for safety.
This is not truth?
Biggest mission of the Torah are how mean genuinely mean. Which believes in the God.
In the God`s word.
Sorry, but author is out of touch with reality. In Hiroshima, about 40,000 people were dead IN THE MOMENT of blast. Later, some 100,000 joined them.
In Tel Aviv, it will be more.
Do your homework, Danny before posting nonsense.
Yosi, please read closely. Obadiah writes, "at ground level" and "primitive bomb" (low-yield, small that is). Both conditions mean the casualties would be many times less than in Hiroshima. Also, Tel Aviv is concrete unlike the then Hiroshima.
One- or two- storey light-weight dwellings (really nice tents?) are always best in an earthquake zone. And dispersion of the population makes it harder to wipe out. But I am skeptical about how "tolerable" a nuclear blast, even if pimative, would be. "Tolerable" in the sense that survivors would for the most part not kill themselves, but not something that could be "tolerated" — very severe revenge would be required. That is why the nuts have to be stopped first.
I'd love to see the Israeli government trying to come up with excuses why we shouldn't retaliate for a nuclear blast, and why we should keep pursuing peace despite that.
Well, actually I bet they'll use the same old washed up sentences they've been recycling and reciting for the past twenty and something years.
This is getting boring, really.
With articles like these, you still wonder why the Arabs hate you? Go tell any people that you want to take their land to create your own state and see their response! Arab hatred is not irrational, like so many like to say. Rather it is based on the fear of disposession, and rightly so! You own official historians of modern Israel - Benny Morris comes to mind - confirms this fact. When the Palestinians say they want to take your land to create their own state, you react in exactly the same way, but you wilfully blind yourselves to this hypocrisy!
You're absolutely correct. We have no doubts that Arabs hate us because they believe we took their land. And we have no doubts the Arabs will hate us for this fact forever - until there will be no Arabs around to hate us.
Please visit a few sites of Jewish leftists and let those ostriches know how you hate them.