Israel’s political “elite” does not want peace. Had it been otherwise, why delay forming the Palestinian state? Israel derives no benefit from occupying the lands settled by Arabs and spends tremendously in lives and money. Israel can retreat behind the borders her government accepts, and deals with Palestine as a state. Other Muslims will not sign peace with Israel when Palestinian state is created in whatever borders. Palestine long ceased to be Israeli bargaining chip in the peace process. Muslim states take its statehood for granted and offer Israel no concessions, such as peace treaty, to achieve independent Palestine.

Arabs, too, don’t want peace with Israel. Zionist enemy comes handy to divert popular attention from economic shortcomings. Totalitarian Arabs and socialist totalitarian Israel need each other for an enemy. Minor wars like Lebanon-2006 consolidate the nations: people think of immediate security, not vague political objective of dismantling socialism.

Quest for peace is leftist invention. Nations historically cooperated and coexisted without peace treaties. In the sensible world, no one expected a treaty to hold if situation changes. Leftists seek Wilsonian eternal peace, guaranteed by paper treaties. That’s a typical leftists approach, that world’s complexities can be rationalized, studied, agreed upon, settled, and planned. Soviet communists expected the economy to confirm to their prescriptions; Israeli leftists imagine the Arabs will stick to the agreements.

Even if all Muslim countries conclude peace with Israel, we won’t be able to count on their good intentions but will have to maintain the army nonetheless. In practical terms, there is no difference between peace treaty and the absence thereof.
Why give Jewish land in return for elusive peace?

peace isn't worth ceasefire