Imagine that the various people who settled in the United States for the past 300 years decided one day that they one to parcel the United States into an independent State just for them, would the American public go for it. The Answer is absolutely NO.

The situation in Israel today is no different. The Arabs there are not Palestinians, there is no such Arab nation as Palestine or Palestinian people.

Europeans countries today are consisting of numerous people from other countries. Would the Europeans people cede part of their country to set up another State in their midst. The answer is absolutely NO.

All the Arabs in Israel and surrounding areas are from the various Arab nations, such as Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Lebanon and other Arab nations.

Prominent PLO Arab says there are no ‘Palestinians’ and no “Palestine”

PLO executive committee member Zahir Muhsein admitted in a March 31, 1977 interview with a Dutch newspaper Trouw.

“The Palestinian people do not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct ‘Palestinian people’ to oppose Zionism. ”

The Qur’an 17:104 – states the land belongs to the Jewish people

If the historic documents, comments written by eyewitnesses and declarations by the most authoritative Arab scholars are still not enough, let us quote the most important source for Muslim Arabs:
“And thereafter we [Allah] said to the Children of Israel: ‘Dwell securely in the Promised Land. And when the last warning will come to pass, we will gather you together in a mingled crowd’.”.
017.104
YUSUFALI: And We said thereafter to the Children of Israel, “Dwell securely in the land (of promise)”: but when the second of the warnings came to pass, We gathered you together in a mingled crowd.
PICKTHAL: And We said unto the Children of Israel after him: Dwell in the land; but when the promise of the Hereafter cometh to pass We shall bring you as a crowd gathered out of various nations.
SHAKIR: And We said to the Israelites after him: Dwell in the land: and when the promise of the next life shall come to pass, we will bring you both together in judgment.
- Qur’an 17:104 -
Any sincere Muslim must recognize the Land they call “Palestine” as the Jewish Homeland, according to the book considered by Muslims to be the most sacred word and Allah’s ultimate revelation.

Sequence of historical events, agreements and a non-broken series of treaties and resolutions, as laid out by the San Remo Resolution, the League of Nations and the United Nations, gives the Jewish People title to the city of Jerusalem and the rest of Israel totaling approximately 45,000 square miles, as mandated by the League of Nations in July of 1922. The process began at San Remo, Italy, when the four Principal Allied Powers of World War I – Great Britain, France, Italy and Japan – agreed to create a Jewish national home in what is now the Land of Israel. (You might as well break apart Syria which was mandated at the same time).

Jay Draiman.

PS
20 Years of Research Reveals Jerusalem Belongs to Jews

(IsraelNN.com) Jacques Gauthier, a non-Jewish Canadian lawyer who spent 20 years researching the legal status of Jerusalem, has concluded: “Jerusalem belongs to the Jews, by international law.”.

Gauthier has written a doctoral dissertation on the topic of Jerusalem and its legal history, based on international treaties and resolutions of the past 90 years. The dissertation runs some 1,300 pages, with 3,000 footnotes. Gauthier had to present his thesis to a world-famous Jewish historian and two leading international lawyers – the Jewish one of whom has represented the Palestinian Authority on numerous occasions.

Gauthier’s main point, as summarized by Israpundit editor Ted Belman, is that a non-broken series of treaties and resolutions, as laid out by the San Remo Resolution, the League of Nations and the United Nations, gives the Jewish People title to the city of Jerusalem. The process began at San Remo, Italy, when the four Principal Allied Powers of World War I – Great Britain, France, Italy and Japan – agreed to create a Jewish national home in what is now the Land of Israel.

We must unleash the wrath of G-D against the enemies of Israel and those collaborating with the enemy.

It is interesting that Obama Jr’s place of birth, Hawaii – although having no bearing on his eligibility to claim full British nationality – raises within United States Federal law, a jus soli issue and, arguably, thereby raises the spectre of his disqualification from eligibility to run for – let alone be elected to – the office of President. It was exactly the same story with Hillary Clinton being ostensibly not eligible for consideration as Secretary of State owing to her existing and remunerated posts. The flouting of these laws, which in the case of a candidate of the Right, would have had the liberal press howling and might well have resulted in a legal opinion being handed down as to eligibility (in both instances) but which, in both cases was entirely absent, demonstrating (a) the will of the liberal establishment to promote its own candidate even at the expense of legality and (b) demonstrates that America is now unable to level accusations where justified of a member of a racial minority playing the race card. We have a further taste of same in Jimmy Carter effectively claiming that any criticism of Obama at all is a result of racially motivated prejudice. We can see why Israel does not stand a chance when this Cateresque mindset is applied to non-American born Jews.

By the way, I have it on the most excellent authority that Hillary Clinton did not earlier this year fracture her wrist, nor was this a nasty rumour started by Dick Cheney. No, I am afraid the simple truth is that our own dear Hillary simply stood up in the Oval Office and broke her hair on glass ceiling.

One of my most pleasant and enduring memories of 2009 will be Jonah Goldberg (author of Liberal Fascism) being interviewed by Dominic Lawson on BBC Radio 4 and calling our own dear Hillary a fascist. I am quite sure that will be the first and last time Mr Goldberg will be invited to speak on any outlet of the BBC. But what an achievement!

Shabbat Shalom.

Secondly, there remains some doubt as to whether Obama’s American mother was in fact married to his Kenyan father. I cast no aspirsions – no one can help the circumstances of his birth and such derogatory comments as I have seen about this remain an utter scurrilous disgrace – but there remains the fact that heretofore, Obama has failed to produce a parental marriage certificate and none is apparently available. Should Obama Jr’s parents therefore not have been married, difficulties would have arisen in establishing his right to British citizenship in that “common law” marriage – a period of co-habitation between a man and a woman sufficient to satisfy the endurability of their association – is, and always was, limited to citizens of the United Kingdom with the established RIGHT OF ABODE. Obama Sr may have been named on the birth certificate but it is a moot point – and under the disrection of the British Home Office – as to whether technical illegitimacy would have been deemed an obstacle to claiming nationality.

Thirdly, at the time of Obama Jr’s birth – and until very recently, certainly within the first 21 years of his life – dual nationality was, under American citizenship legislation, not permitted, requiring all those born of one American parent, who, under the various and sundry terms of right of citizenship of a country other than the USA enjoyed the nationality of said country, to decide at their majority (formerly 21, now 18 years of age) which of their parental countries they wished to be a citizen.

The question of Obama Jr’s parental marriage status notwithstanding, Obama Jr enjoys American nationality from his mother – his place of birth, Hawaii, being irrelevant with regard to its relationship with the British Crown at that time – and as Obama Jr did not actively seek nationality of the then Republic of Kenya at either 18 or 21 years of age, or seek to establish his right to British nationality – which would have been tenuous to say the least – he is, as he always was, a citizen of the United States of America.

The bearer of a passport of a Crown Colony enjoyed the protection of the Crown as a citizen of that Crown colony and does not enjoy the protection of the British government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland per se. Obama Sr thus enjoyed a “devolved” relationship with the British Crown, which, as already argued, was irrevocably changed at Kenyan Independence.

I hope this is now as clear as mud. To whom do I send my invoice?

If I may express a personal opinion, I was much annoyed with the liberal left’s propaganda that George Bush Jr was a gibbering idiot. He was not, passing out of Yale with grades similar, if not in some subjects, superior, to those of his first oppenent, Senator Al Gore, whose political correctness over global warming and other indulgencies, seems to have given him the reputation in certain circles of a born-again genius.

It must be said, however, that George Bush Jr’s verbal skills leave much to be desired. What I cannot bear about the Obama presidency is that after being lectured to for the past eight years by a seeming six-year-old, we now have to endure the ramblings of an American president who seems to think the rest of the world is six years old. Every time Obama opens his mouth, I have the distinct impression that I am being patronized – and he does so at his very peril. But then, as “Professor” Obama is no doubt aware in the bowels of his polished intellect, “those who can, do; those who can’t, teach”.

Arguably, this Act granted neither the de facto and thereby automatic right of citizenship to citizens born in Crown colonies, nor to those born in Crown dominions. (The distinction is significant, because India, Pakistan and other “territories overseas” – including the Republic of Ireland – passed first to dominion status before becoming republics within the British Commonwealth – now simply “The Commonwealth”. This, incidentally, was a passage to independence that Israel herself was entirely legally entitled to make, as is membership of The Commonwealth today – but understandably, under the tyranny of the post-war Labour Fascist government of Clement Atlee, she did not want to make.)

The British Nationality Act, 1948, although providing for the right of all citizens of Crown colonies, dominions, dependencies and territories overseas, in fact required all aspirants of such territories to British Nationality not only to prove their eligibility but to apply for said national status which other statutory laws could inhibit, delay or even annul. The Act therefore did not confer British Nationality upon Obama Sr and there is no record of his having applied for British Nationality, let alone having been granted same.

The British Nationaity Act of 1948 was also subject to SUBSEQUENT Parliamentary legislation granting indpendence to various and sundry of the Crown colonies which thereafter enjoyed dominion status or proceeded to full independence on an immediate basis.

Furthermore, the British Nationality Act of 1948 has been subsequently superseded by further Parliamentary legislation, most notably the Commonwealth Immigrants Act, 1962, which removed the automatic right to the RIGHT OF ABODE in the United Kingdom to Commonwealth citizens, a determining factor in Obama Jr’s ability to claim British citizenship as it also changed the circumstances in which the legal concept of jus soli was applicable – had Obama Jr been born in Britain, he would not necessarily have been able to claim “droit de sol” as a condition of entitlement – and the Act was subsequently up-dated in the British Nationality Act, 1981, which effectively created a three-tier entitlement and outcome to any application for British Nationality, rendering three distinct categories of citizenship: (a) British citizenship; (b)British Dependent Territories citizenship and; (c)
British Overseas citizenship, which effectively
rendered null and void the prescriptions of the British Nationality Act of 1948 for those persons who had not availed themselves of its provisions before they were mitigated by subsequent leglislative measures.

It is thus clear, even on the most cursory of readings of the 1948 and subsequent Nationality Acts that Obama Sr was not a British Citizen, his son Obama Jr was never de facto a British Citizen and did not and does not qualify for automatic British Citizenship under that original or any subsequent Nationality Act, it being the case that neither attempted to establish his presumed relationship with the Crown for status under the Crown of subject of His Majesty, King George VI or Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II, in order to enjoy the privileges and duties of those deemed eligible for Crown protection.

The British Empire and, more latterly, the governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland may reasonably be criticized for many egregious decisions on the world stage – as they may also be congratulated for many positive contributions to the world community of nations and the rule of international law, the endemic and shameful persistence of anti-Semitism with regard to their policies toward Israel notwithstanding.

It remains, however, an injustice – from which Israel herself suffers continually – to criticize a nation for things it has not done and over which it has no control and it is thus disengenuous to argue as hereabove that President Obama enjoys British Nationality. He does not. In this instance, this is a case for rejoicing, given that we cannot be held accountable in any way for his actions and, secondly, have, on this occasion, the demonstrable good taste not to indulge a posturing Liberal Fascist, if for no other reason than we have more than an excellent sufficiency of home-grown examples of them to contend with as it is, without importing them from former colonies (the United States of America being but one).

Millud, here rests the case for the prosecution. Let him swing.