Comments on: Moses, the first terrorist (not Mohammed) http://samsonblinded.org/blog/moses-the-terrorist.htm A Machiavellian Perspective on the Middle East Conflict Wed, 17 Mar 2010 13:48:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Euronyme http://samsonblinded.org/blog/moses-the-terrorist.htm/comment-page-1#comment-85622 Euronyme Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:46:32 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/?p=19#comment-85622 U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) defined terrorism as: “The calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.” So... Moses a terrorist? Yepp. Take consolation in that its only fictional though. U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) defined terrorism as: “The calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.”

So… Moses a terrorist? Yepp. Take consolation in that its only fictional though.

]]> By: nazir Ahmad Bhat http://samsonblinded.org/blog/moses-the-terrorist.htm/comment-page-1#comment-59020 nazir Ahmad Bhat Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:56:15 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/?p=19#comment-59020 you are more right that no religion can ever teach terrorisim.muslims following the exact message of islam can never adopt any kind of voilence/terrorisim.even; war principles as between judiasim and islam; one can appreciate how humane are war principles strictly in islamic regime without commenting what it apperas in judiasim.muslims whereever;fighting for political rights if devaite from islamic principles can well be judged in the context of islam.morever, islam prohibit strictly to address any prophet of any abrahim religion with casual or underate address.thanks you are more right that no religion can ever teach terrorisim.muslims following the exact message of islam can never adopt any kind of voilence/terrorisim.even; war principles as between judiasim and islam; one can appreciate how humane are war principles strictly in islamic regime without commenting what it apperas in judiasim.muslims whereever;fighting for political rights if devaite from islamic principles can well be judged in the context of islam.morever, islam prohibit strictly to address any prophet of any abrahim religion with casual or underate address.thanks

]]> By: elie http://samsonblinded.org/blog/moses-the-terrorist.htm/comment-page-1#comment-46291 elie Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:45:45 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/?p=19#comment-46291 religion is the cause of politics, but blaming the significant people in a religion as terrosists then there is no reason to follow a evil religion. Every religion has a sense to make peac e with one another. Having that ideology of terroism can caus violence and conlfict. By these comment im reading it seems there is confusion to what relgion means. Islam, Buddhism, Judiams and Christianity are all religion who were formed mainly for the 'sake of peace' not for war and for terrosirsm. God doesnt want his children to kill eachother. There is only one God or supreme creator that want everyone to 'love thy neighbour as thyself'. Yes there are terosist attacks occuring, but these people are the muslims groups who misinterpret the Quran and what its message. My opinion, terrorism and having that ideology as evryone can be a terrosist can cause much conflict and violence.!! religion is the cause of politics, but blaming the significant people in a religion as terrosists then there is no reason to follow a evil religion. Every religion has a sense to make peac e with one another. Having that ideology of terroism can caus violence and conlfict. By these comment im reading it seems there is confusion to what relgion means. Islam, Buddhism, Judiams and Christianity are all religion who were formed mainly for the ’sake of peace’ not for war and for terrosirsm. God doesnt want his children to kill eachother. There is only one God or supreme creator that want everyone to ‘love thy neighbour as thyself’. Yes there are terosist attacks occuring, but these people are the muslims groups who misinterpret the Quran and what its message. My opinion, terrorism and having that ideology as evryone can be a terrosist can cause much conflict and violence.!!

]]> By: John Black http://samsonblinded.org/blog/moses-the-terrorist.htm/comment-page-1#comment-19002 John Black Fri, 13 Apr 2007 12:02:39 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/?p=19#comment-19002 Moses a terrorist????????????????? WHO do you think commanded him to deliver his people by sending plagues? Popeye and Olive oil? Moses a terrorist?????????????????
WHO do you think commanded him to deliver his people by sending plagues? Popeye and Olive oil?

]]> By: Talat Pasha http://samsonblinded.org/blog/moses-the-terrorist.htm/comment-page-1#comment-18051 Talat Pasha Thu, 05 Apr 2007 18:26:59 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/?p=19#comment-18051 Maria, you [MODERATED]! No text is sacred, and Jesus was a terrorist. What's wrong with terrorrizing the exploiters? OH, by the way: Religion iS politics, no need to mix them and no possibility to seperate them..... FYI ;) Maria, you [MODERATED]! No text is sacred, and Jesus was a terrorist. What’s wrong with terrorrizing the exploiters?
OH, by the way: Religion iS politics, no need to mix them and no possibility to seperate them…..
FYI ;)

]]> By: maria http://samsonblinded.org/blog/moses-the-terrorist.htm/comment-page-1#comment-6 maria Sat, 01 Apr 2006 09:56:34 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/?p=19#comment-6 I suppose Jews (or Arabs, or Swedes, or whoever) accuse terrorists of terrorism. Applying the political vocabulary of our own times to sacred literature is so absurd that it becomes comical. Just following that logic....Jesus was a terrorist, Muhammad was a terrorist, Buddha was a terrorist...not to speak of Satan. Mixing religion and politics is a bad, baaaaad idea. I suppose Jews (or Arabs, or Swedes, or whoever) accuse terrorists of terrorism. Applying the political vocabulary of our own times to sacred literature is so absurd that it becomes comical. Just following that logic….Jesus was a terrorist, Muhammad was a terrorist, Buddha was a terrorist…not to speak of Satan. Mixing religion and politics is a bad, baaaaad idea.

]]>