Comments on: Legal crime http://samsonblinded.org/blog/legal-crime.htm A Machiavellian Perspective on the Middle East Conflict Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:09:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Danny the Admin http://samsonblinded.org/blog/legal-crime.htm/comment-page-1#comment-15462 Danny the Admin Wed, 28 Mar 2007 01:45:35 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/legal-crime.htm#comment-15462 My dear Yusuf, and what kind of peace do you envisage besides resting in peace after drowning the Jews in sea? My dear Yusuf, and what kind of peace do you envisage besides resting in peace after drowning the Jews in sea?

]]> By: Yusuf http://samsonblinded.org/blog/legal-crime.htm/comment-page-1#comment-15402 Yusuf Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:35:08 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/legal-crime.htm#comment-15402 You hatred minded people trying to Explain You're Criminal law with racist words , I'm not sure that you'll find peace till you believe in the meaning of peace.. You hatred minded people trying to Explain You’re Criminal law with racist words , I’m not sure that you’ll find peace till you believe in the meaning of peace..

]]> By: Danny the Admin http://samsonblinded.org/blog/legal-crime.htm/comment-page-1#comment-13938 Danny the Admin Sat, 24 Mar 2007 20:48:26 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/legal-crime.htm#comment-13938 You've got it. Freedom of speech is a weapon: I can use, but my enemy cannot You’ve got it. Freedom of speech is a weapon: I can use, but my enemy cannot

]]> By: distant observer http://samsonblinded.org/blog/legal-crime.htm/comment-page-1#comment-13913 distant observer Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:31:48 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/legal-crime.htm#comment-13913 i think you're just trying to muddy the waters with all this "illegal but lawful...unlawful but moral" stuff. your basic principle is - i can enjoj free speech 'cause i'm right, and because i'm right you don't have that freedom... whichever way you cut it, Israel is a very strange entity and any reference to americans, europeans, russians or anybody else is irrelevant. Jews have *teen different opinions on the same subject per person and to achieve arab transfer in your lifetime is an "unachievable dream" and after that - who knows if there is a Jewish state i think you’re just trying to muddy the waters with all this “illegal but lawful…unlawful but moral” stuff. your basic principle is – i can enjoj free speech ’cause i’m right, and because i’m right you don’t have that freedom…
whichever way you cut it, Israel is a very strange entity and any reference to americans, europeans, russians or anybody else is irrelevant. Jews have *teen different opinions on the same subject per person and to achieve arab transfer in your lifetime is an “unachievable dream” and after that – who knows if there is a Jewish state

]]> By: Alain http://samsonblinded.org/blog/legal-crime.htm/comment-page-1#comment-13878 Alain Fri, 23 Mar 2007 22:36:38 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/legal-crime.htm#comment-13878 "disrespect to the state and arousing discontent" - interesting indeed. Of course this could never apply to the Israeli Arabs even those found fighting in Iraq for al Qaeda. This is truly a case where the law is an ass. “disrespect to the state and arousing discontent” – interesting indeed. Of course this could never apply to the Israeli Arabs even those found fighting in Iraq for al Qaeda.

This is truly a case where the law is an ass.

]]> By: Danny the Admin http://samsonblinded.org/blog/legal-crime.htm/comment-page-1#comment-13740 Danny the Admin Fri, 23 Mar 2007 11:31:58 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/legal-crime.htm#comment-13740 Not confusing, but incorrect. Transfer of Palestinians from Israel need not be a peaceful event, but even so, it is a must, and free speech is supported to that end. On other hand, breeding of Arabs in Israel to outnumber the Jews of the sort advocated by Arafat and Ahmadinejad is painless but unacceptable. Protection of free speech is a matter of expediency. As Obadiah wrote, we support our free speech and suppress free speech of our enemies. Free speech is a weapon like any other. Not confusing, but incorrect. Transfer of Palestinians from Israel need not be a peaceful event, but even so, it is a must, and free speech is supported to that end.
On other hand, breeding of Arabs in Israel to outnumber the Jews of the sort advocated by Arafat and Ahmadinejad is painless but unacceptable.
Protection of free speech is a matter of expediency. As Obadiah wrote, we support our free speech and suppress free speech of our enemies. Free speech is a weapon like any other.

]]> By: The Atheist Jew http://samsonblinded.org/blog/legal-crime.htm/comment-page-1#comment-13713 The Atheist Jew Fri, 23 Mar 2007 02:15:51 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/legal-crime.htm#comment-13713 Morality and ethics are totally relative terms. Everyone has a different definition of what is moral and what is immoral on a case by case situation and it all boils down to that person's definition. I've written lots about morality, and I have my own definition. Free speech against the government is not what I would deem to be immoral, although I consider most crimes in a Western society to be immoral. If free speech is used to incite pain and suffering on an individual though, that would be considered immoral by me....but even so, some things are more immoral than others. Confusing enough for you? Morality and ethics are totally relative terms. Everyone has a different definition of what is moral and what is immoral on a case by case situation and it all boils down to that person’s definition.
I’ve written lots about morality, and I have my own definition. Free speech against the government is not what I would deem to be immoral, although I consider most crimes in a Western society to be immoral. If free speech is used to incite pain and suffering on an individual though, that would be considered immoral by me….but even so, some things are more immoral than others.

Confusing enough for you?

]]>