The solution to the conflict seems self-evident: when two people contest the land, split it to satisfy both. Historically, such approach never worked. Nations split the contested territories based on the balance of power rather than equitably. Settled disputes keep boiling and erupt once the balance of power changes: the dominant power weakens or the determination to challenge it grows. If Arabs accepted the 1948 refugees, why won’t they accept the 2008 refugees? If they accepted that 2/3 of Palestinian population was expelled in 1948, why won’t they accept that a 100% of the Palestinian population will be expelled in 2008? If Arabs accepted a Jewish state in the Palestinian land in the 1967 borders why won’t they accept it including Judea and Samaria? If, on other hand, Arabs in their hearts did not accept Israel or the 1948 displacement of Palestinians, why appease them? Cleanse more land for the Jewish state. Arabs won’t hate us more after we drive them to Jordan.

There was no peace in 1966; why would the peace ensue after Israel withdraws to the 1967 borders? Palestinians are much more nationalist and militant than before, and Arab armies gained strength. Arab morale is on the rise while Jewish nationalism dwindles. The border is not a problem. The problem is a Jewish state in Muslim lands; that’s an insult for Arabs. Jewish residents of Israeli towns resist the Arabs moving into their neighborhoods; how much more the xenophobic Arabs resist Jewish invasion into their lands?

There was a peace process between America and Germany, after the WWI; it resulted in WWII. Only the unconditional surrender in WWII when the Allies redrew German borders at will and transferred ethnic Germans out of France, Poland, and Czechoslovakia, created sustainable peace. Peace process with guerrillas is self-delusion. Whatever treaty Abbas signs, Al Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigade, PIJ, PRC, PFLP, and similar outfits won’t adhere to it. Fatah doesn’t fight Israel now – the militant groups do. What would change if Israel formally abandons Judea and Samaria? They will still fight the Zionist state. In fact, they will be emboldened by the apparent success of driving out a strong enemy, just like the victories in Afghanistan, Lebanon, Somalia, Gaza encouraged Muslims worldwide. Unilateral withdrawal is more of a goodwill gesture than peace settlement, but Arabs shower Israel with rockets after she gave them Gaza. Goodwill, especially forced goodwill, is never reciprocated.

Two people can settle their dispute because they fear each other and the police, and personal disputes are rarely critical. Nationalist disputes are central to collective mentality, and their participants aren’t afraid to die and eager to kill. They want to achieve their goals rather than attain safety. Arab governments support Palestinian guerrillas as a viable alternative to an all-out war with Israel.

Annihilated enemy is the only good peace partner.