
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Haifa and Ashkelon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://samsonblinded.org/blog/haifa-and-ashkelon.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://samsonblinded.org/blog/haifa-and-ashkelon.htm</link>
	<description>A Machiavellian Perspective on the Middle East Conflict</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:16:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RAQUEL</title>
		<link>http://samsonblinded.org/blog/haifa-and-ashkelon.htm/comment-page-1#comment-24915</link>
		<dc:creator>RAQUEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 12:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://samsonblinded.org/blog/haifa-and-ashkelon.htm#comment-24915</guid>
		<description>&quot;(...)only massive, cruel repressions of civilians eradicate popular support for insurgents.&quot;

IN MY OPINION, POPULAR SUPPORT IS A SNOW BALL.
IF NOT WITH THE TODAY&#039;S HAMAS, WITH AL-FATAH (EVEN WORST).
THE OSLO AGREEMENTS ARE STUCKED, FIRST BECAUSE U.S PALESTIAN AIDE WAS PUTTED IN STAKE.
THE PREVIOUS U.S NOTION OF WHAT IS RADICAL POLITICAL GROUP WAS NOT TAKEN IS CONSIDERATION  ALSO BECAUSE MOSSAD FAILURE ON THE STUDY BETWEEN WHO SHOULD BE ARMED CLOSE ISRAEL BOARDERS (IN MY OPINION, THAT MEANS HAMAS TRAFFIC GUNS TO HEZBOLLAH AND VICE-VERSA)
BUT IN LOCO, ISRAEL DOES NEED POLITICAL COMPENSATIONS ON HER EFFORTS OF FULLFILLING AN AGENDA, AND SO ARMMED INSURGENTS ARE STILL PART OF THE ISRAELI POLITICS.
MY QUESTION IS:
IF ERRADICATING POPULAR SUPPORTS ON LEARDERSHIPS THAT DON&#039;T STAND FOR GENTLEMEN ACCORDS, WOULD LEAVE THE ISRAELI RADICALS (LIKE YOU) ON A NEW MIDLEA EAST POLITICAL ORDER?...
OR, EUROPEAN PRAGMATIC SUPPORT ON BOTH SIDES, WILL HELP DRAW NEW PALESTINIAN AND ISRAELI LEADERSHIPS ?
THE &quot;ENTENTE CORDIALLE&quot; EUROPÉANNE ON LEBANNON ISN&#039;T GOOD NEWS FOR ISRAEL?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;(&#8230;)only massive, cruel repressions of civilians eradicate popular support for insurgents.&#8221;</p>
<p>IN MY OPINION, POPULAR SUPPORT IS A SNOW BALL.<br />
IF NOT WITH THE TODAY&#8217;S HAMAS, WITH AL-FATAH (EVEN WORST).<br />
THE OSLO AGREEMENTS ARE STUCKED, FIRST BECAUSE U.S PALESTIAN AIDE WAS PUTTED IN STAKE.<br />
THE PREVIOUS U.S NOTION OF WHAT IS RADICAL POLITICAL GROUP WAS NOT TAKEN IS CONSIDERATION  ALSO BECAUSE MOSSAD FAILURE ON THE STUDY BETWEEN WHO SHOULD BE ARMED CLOSE ISRAEL BOARDERS (IN MY OPINION, THAT MEANS HAMAS TRAFFIC GUNS TO HEZBOLLAH AND VICE-VERSA)<br />
BUT IN LOCO, ISRAEL DOES NEED POLITICAL COMPENSATIONS ON HER EFFORTS OF FULLFILLING AN AGENDA, AND SO ARMMED INSURGENTS ARE STILL PART OF THE ISRAELI POLITICS.<br />
MY QUESTION IS:<br />
IF ERRADICATING POPULAR SUPPORTS ON LEARDERSHIPS THAT DON&#8217;T STAND FOR GENTLEMEN ACCORDS, WOULD LEAVE THE ISRAELI RADICALS (LIKE YOU) ON A NEW MIDLEA EAST POLITICAL ORDER?&#8230;<br />
OR, EUROPEAN PRAGMATIC SUPPORT ON BOTH SIDES, WILL HELP DRAW NEW PALESTINIAN AND ISRAELI LEADERSHIPS ?<br />
THE &#8220;ENTENTE CORDIALLE&#8221; EUROPÉANNE ON LEBANNON ISN&#8217;T GOOD NEWS FOR ISRAEL?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
