Comments on: Freedom of hate speech http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm A Machiavellian Perspective on the Middle East Conflict Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:09:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: RAQUEL http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm/comment-page-1#comment-9857 RAQUEL Wed, 07 Mar 2007 10:28:27 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm#comment-9857 karl popper is an asshall: who in the hell agrees when he says that the worst thing it can happen to a governement is return to the opposition?? about social engenneering: that calls for new socialism wave like xangai type. some corruption aloud. and more money support globalazation issues karl popper is an asshall: who in the hell agrees when he says that the worst thing it can happen to a governement is return to the opposition??
about social engenneering: that calls for new socialism wave like xangai type.
some corruption aloud.
and more money support globalazation issues

]]> By: Danny the Admin http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm/comment-page-1#comment-9815 Danny the Admin Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:37:16 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm#comment-9815 Oh, I see. Negative, sure. I guess, sort of Karl Popper's usage. Natural development of societies as opposed to social engineering of utopian societies. Primitive rationalism, in other words. Oh, I see. Negative, sure. I guess, sort of Karl Popper’s usage. Natural development of societies as opposed to social engineering of utopian societies. Primitive rationalism, in other words.

]]> By: chaim http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm/comment-page-1#comment-9813 chaim Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:38:21 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm#comment-9813 Danny, just it's not clear to me in the Ovadiah's article if he used "engineering" as a positive or negative idea. Can you explain it more? Danny, just it’s not clear to me in the Ovadiah’s article if he used “engineering” as a positive or negative idea. Can you explain it more?

]]> By: Danny the Admin http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm/comment-page-1#comment-9810 Danny the Admin Tue, 06 Mar 2007 12:01:14 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm#comment-9810 To Chaim: I understand Obadiah's reference to social engineering as about communist policies of consciously changing societies according to the planners' blueprint. Like in Rousseau. To Raquel: that's republicanism, actually. To Chaim: I understand Obadiah’s reference to social engineering as about communist policies of consciously changing societies according to the planners’ blueprint. Like in Rousseau.

To Raquel: that’s republicanism, actually.

]]> By: chaim http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm/comment-page-1#comment-9808 chaim Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:40:01 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm#comment-9808 By the way, can you write more about "social engineering" Thanks By the way, can you write more about “social engineering” Thanks

]]> By: RAQUEL http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm/comment-page-1#comment-9806 RAQUEL Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:10:18 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm#comment-9806 DEMOCRACY IS NOT THE GOVERNEMENT OF THE MAJORITY BUT THE AGREEMENT WITH THE MINORATIES DEMOCRACY IS NOT THE GOVERNEMENT OF THE MAJORITY BUT THE AGREEMENT WITH THE MINORATIES

]]> By: Danny the Admin http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm/comment-page-1#comment-9745 Danny the Admin Mon, 05 Mar 2007 09:57:47 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm#comment-9745 I agree, "extremism" is ideology of the parties who lost. The winners are "revolutionaries." I agree, “extremism” is ideology of the parties who lost. The winners are “revolutionaries.”

]]> By: chaim http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm/comment-page-1#comment-9744 chaim Mon, 05 Mar 2007 08:40:06 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm#comment-9744 Well, It's already know the difference between the cofee-leftist and the reality. Because this, when majestic thinkers wrapped in their bubbles try to align themselves with root-thinkers, the issue always goes wrong. Of course this bubble does not support extreme critics, so they inmmediately try to label them of dangerous. About extremist ideas: Try to define "extremist". Of course for us jews nazism and fascism is extremist, but also communism and atheism. But the latter 2 are adopted by many people without critics. Everything is relative. Nazism was defeated, so it was labeled as extremist. But, spanish empire killed 50 millon native Americans and even there is a conmemorative day, "race day" in south america. So what is extremism? Extremism could be applied to any doctrine calling for radical changes in society, and annoying the status quo. Leftist need to Be part of the status quo, usefull to the governmet mainframe, otherwise they won't get any job as "thinkers". Since people never vote massively for cofee leftists, they need to wear themselves with a patina of "higher brains" and from that place be used as accusators by the system. Good is enemy of the best.. Well, It’s already know the difference between the cofee-leftist and the reality. Because this, when majestic thinkers wrapped in their bubbles try to align themselves with root-thinkers, the issue always goes wrong. Of course this bubble does not support extreme critics, so they inmmediately try to label them of dangerous. About extremist ideas:
Try to define “extremist”. Of course for us jews nazism and fascism is extremist, but also communism and atheism. But the latter 2 are adopted by many people without critics. Everything is relative. Nazism was defeated, so it was labeled as extremist. But, spanish empire killed 50 millon native Americans and even there is a conmemorative day, “race day” in south america. So what is extremism? Extremism could be applied to any doctrine calling for radical changes in society, and annoying the status quo. Leftist need to Be part of the status quo, usefull to the governmet mainframe, otherwise they won’t get any job as “thinkers”. Since people never vote massively for cofee leftists, they need to wear themselves with a patina of “higher brains” and from that place be used as accusators by the system. Good is enemy of the best..

]]> By: Alain http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm/comment-page-1#comment-9696 Alain Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:38:57 +0000 http://samsonblinded.org/blog/freedom-of-hate-speech.htm#comment-9696 This is a subject where I usually find myself at odds with most of other Jews. I remain opposed to any form of "hate speech laws" even when it comes to the lunatic denial of the Holocaust. The reason is that it only serves to drive such people into the shadows and even gives them credibility in the eyes of others. I prefer to expose them to the light. I do not have trouble seeing the difference between these present laws and people who actually use free speech to incite violence, murder, etc. Yet what happens in countries with this "hate laws" is that anyone exposing Muslims inciting the murder of "infidels" is the one facing charges under the "hate laws", Anyone disagreeing with the homosexual agenda that such behaviour must be accepted by everyone as perfectly normal faces the same kind of charge. It is a totalitarian attempt to control how people think and it can never work. This is a subject where I usually find myself at odds with most of other Jews. I remain opposed to any form of “hate speech laws” even when it comes to the lunatic denial of the Holocaust. The reason is that it only serves to drive such people into the shadows and even gives them credibility in the eyes of others. I prefer to expose them to the light. I do not have trouble seeing the difference between these present laws and people who actually use free speech to incite violence, murder, etc.

Yet what happens in countries with this “hate laws” is that anyone exposing Muslims inciting the murder of “infidels” is the one facing charges under the “hate laws”, Anyone disagreeing with the homosexual agenda that such behaviour must be accepted by everyone as perfectly normal faces the same kind of charge.

It is a totalitarian attempt to control how people think and it can never work.

]]>